@article {Rothstein2012,
	title = {Review: Schlonzska mowa. J{\k e}zyk, G{\'o}rny {\'S}l{\k a}sk i nacjonalizm, 1., and: Zbornik polsko-{\'s}l{\r u}nski/S{\l}ownik polsko-{\'s}l{\k a}ski, 1: A{\textendash}K, 2: L{\textendash}P},
	journal = {Journal of Slavic linguistics},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {145{\textendash}148},
	keywords = {reviews, рецензии},
	author = {Rothstein, Robert Allen}
}
@article {Ransohoff2011,
	title = {The Relationship Between Land and Power in Terterid Bulgaria: a Comparative Study of the Appanages of Eltimir and Smilets},
	journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика},
	volume = {35},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {37{\textendash}47},
	author = {Ransohoff, Jake}
}
@inbook {Rumble2011,
	title = {Religion as Collective Identity},
	booktitle = {Social Cognition, Social Identity, and Intergroup Relations. A Festschrift in Honor of Marilynn B. Brewer},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {145-161},
	publisher = {Psychology Press},
	organization = {Psychology Press},
	address = {New York},
	author = {Rumble, Ann C.},
	editor = {Roderick M. Kramer and Geoffrey J. Leonardelli and Robert W. Livingston}
}
@book {Rose2009,
	title = {Ritual Memory: The Apocryphal Acts and Liturgical Commemoration in the Early Medieval West (c. 500-1215)},
	year = {2009},
	author = {Rose, E}
}
@inbook {Radwan2008,
	title = {Religion and popular communication},
	booktitle = {The International Encyclopedia of Communication},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {4179{\textendash} 4182},
	publisher = {Blackwell},
	organization = {Blackwell},
	address = {Oxford},
	author = {Radwan, Jon},
	editor = {Wolfgand Donsbach}
}
@book {Rautenberg2003,
	title = {Reclams Sachw{\"o}rterbuch des Buches},
	year = {2003},
	pages = {590},
	publisher = {Philipp Reclam jun},
	organization = {Philipp Reclam jun},
	address = {Stuttgart},
	editor = {Rautenberg, Ursula}
}
@inbook {Giles1988,
	title = {Research on language attitudes},
	booktitle = {Sociolinguistics. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society},
	volume = {1},
	year = {1988},
	pages = {585{\textendash}597},
	publisher = {Walter de Gruyter},
	organization = {Walter de Gruyter},
	address = {Berlin ; New York},
	author = {Howard Giles and Miles Hewstone and Ellen B. Ryan and Patricia Johnson},
	editor = {Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar and Klaus Mattheier}
}
@article {Requedat1982,
	title = {Remarques sur les constructions verbales avec l{\textquoteright}infinitif},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {7},
	year = {1982},
	pages = {73{\textendash}78},
	abstract = {A model of classifying French verbs used in constructions of the type: verb + {\`a}, de, 0 + infinitive is offered. The prepositions {\`a} and de are terms of the surface structure which show traces of operations in the deep structure: definiteness, modality, aspect. The verbs analysed are classified according to their meaning, the formal differences between the constructions being considered within the framework of the groups obtained.},
	author = {Requedat, Fran\c cois}
}
@book {Lemon1965,
	title = {Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays},
	year = {1965},
	publisher = {Univ. of Nebraska Press},
	organization = {Univ. of Nebraska Press},
	address = {Lincoln},
	abstract = {<p>The Russian formalists emerged from the Russian Revolution with ideas about the independence of literature. They enjoyed that independence until Stalin shut them down. By then, however, they had produced essays that remain among the best defenses ever written for both literature and its theory.</p><p>Included here are four essays representing key points in the formalists{\textquoteright} short history. Victor Shklovsky{\textquoteright}s pioneering {\textquotedblleft}Art as Technique{\textquotedblright} (1917) defines the literary as a way to make us see familiar things as if for the first time. His 1921 essay on Tristram Shandy makes that eccentric novel the centerpiece for a theory of narrative. A section from Boris Tomashevsky{\textquoteright}s {\textquotedblleft}Thematics{\textquotedblright} (1925) inventories the elements of stories. In {\textquotedblleft}The Theory of the {\textquoteleft}Formal Method{\textquoteright}{\textquotedblright} (1927), Boris Eichenbaum defends Russian Formalism against various attacks. An able champion, he describes Formalism{\textquoteright}s evolution, notes its major figures and works, clears away decayed axioms, and rescues literature from {\textquotedblleft}primitive historicism{\textquotedblright} and other dangers.</p>}
}
