@article {Парашкевов1999, title = {Декомпозицията като похват при заемането на немски сложни думи}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {24}, year = {1999}, pages = {26{\textendash}33}, abstract = {

Gegenstand der Untersuchung ist die gelegentlich vorkommende K{\"u}rzung von deutschen Zusammensetzungen bei ihrer {\"U}bernahme ins Bulgarische. Erl{\"a}utert werden die Begriffe Isolierungen und Fragmentierungen als Unterarten der sog. Kopf- und Schwanzw{\"o}rter. Die Aufdeckung der deutschen Vorlagen von Lehnw{\"o}rtern wie абрихт, анцуг, блинт, винт,герб, хутпак, щрайх w{\"a}re ein Unterpfand daf{\"u}r, dass die sie betreffende etymologische Information in Nachschlagewerken korrekt sein wird. Erst dann w{\"u}rde man beispielsweise das typographische Fachwort блинт nicht naiverweise auf dt. blind, sondern auf dt. Blinddruck zur{\"u}ckf{\"u}hren.

}, keywords = {Language Contacts, Езикови контакти}, author = {Парашкевов, Борис} } @article {Парашкевов1993, title = {Няколко случая на хетеросемия в балканските езици}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {18}, year = {1993}, pages = {25{\textendash}30}, abstract = {

The semantic evolution of words is an indispensable part of their historical development. It is determined both by intralinguistic and extralinguistic factors. In the course of migration, a borrowing can be incorporated within the language of adjacent or remote language communities taking on a modified meaning within the same semantic field. This very divergence in meaning, or heterosemy, across language systems is a constant source of misunderstanding. The article examines the semantic deviation of a number of words common to the Balkan languages.The need to explicitly point out cases of partial or complete heterosemy when learning a foreign language, as a means to avoid interference-induced errors in translation and communication is stressed upon. In addition, the article takes the view that when providing the etymology of borrowings it is appropriate to specify the lexical prototype in the source or intermediary language and to trace the semasiological changes undergone.

}, keywords = {Language Contacts, Езикови контакти}, author = {Парашкевов, Борис} } @article {Парашкевов1990, title = {Словообразувателни парадигми при интернационализмите}, journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics}, volume = {15}, year = {1990}, pages = {248{\textendash}252}, abstract = {

Examples from the international lexicon are adduced in the article, showing how two or more word-formation paradigms distinguished by a semantic feature are established in the framework of etymologically related derivational sequences. They contain functional-categorial positions which partly reflect in an adequate way the prototype and which are partly replenished with secondary home or foreign formations. For this reason, in the comparison of analogous paradigms in different languages structural and/or semantic deviations are established. Their systematic investigation gives evidence of the development of migration of internationalisms and their timely discovery in foreign language teaching helps the achievement of perfect communication.

}, keywords = {Language Contacts, Езикови контакти}, author = {Парашкевов, Борис} }