@article {Михов1990,
	title = {Функционални еквиваленти на българското сегашно време при превода му на френски език},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {15},
	year = {1990},
	pages = {218{\textendash}222},
	abstract = {The wide variety of French translation correspondences of the Bulgarian present tense includes not only the basic indicative tenses but other moods too},
	author = {Михов, Николай}
}
@article {Михов1989,
	title = {Семантично-синтактична характеристика на френските подчинени темпорални изречения с футурална съотнесеност},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {ХІV},
	year = {1989},
	pages = {108{\textendash}115},
	abstract = {On the basis of the independent binary opposition between subordinate tensed clauses with a semantic-morphological future reference, in which the meaning of futurity is expressed by future tenses, on the one hand, and the subordinate tensed clauses with only a semantic future reference conveyed by present tense verb forms, on the other hand, an analysis is made of the basic meanings of the most typical subordinating conjunctions (quand, lorsque, tant que, pendant que) and mostly of the alternation of verb tenses and moods on a comparative basis with Bulgarian. The great variety of forms in French is shown in contrast to their low variability in Bulgarian subordinate tense predicate units.},
	author = {Михов, Николай}
}
@article {Михов1988,
	title = {Летен езиков курс в Париж},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {13},
	year = {1988},
	pages = {127},
	keywords = {Events, Хроника},
	author = {Михов, Николай}
}
@article {Михов1987,
	title = {Дезактуализиращата същност на плусквамперфекта във френския и българския език},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {12},
	year = {1987},
	pages = {9{\textendash}19},
	abstract = {The paper deals with some characteristics of the French plus-que-parfait in contrast with Bulgarian. After analysing the morphological similarities and differences of the corresponding tenses in the contrasted languages, the author dwells on a specific, though limited in use, function of the plus-que-parfait to set up a secondary narrative line. Its tendency to merge with the aorist is considered as closely related to and dependent on the merger of the aorist and pass{\'e} compos{\'e} observed in the spoken language. The translation problems arising from the incongruence of the contrasted language systems have also been discussed.},
	author = {Михов, Николай}
}
@article {Михов1983,
	title = {Бъдеще предварително време като елемент от темпоралната система на френския и българския език},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {8},
	year = {1983},
	pages = {35{\textendash}51},
	abstract = {The paper discusses the semantic structure of the futur ant{\'e}rieur tense in French as a unity of temporal, modal and stylistic values. The tense is contrasted with the morphological category of its Bulgarian counterpart, represented by the paradigm of its functional translation equivalents. Compared to the Bulgarian future perfect tense the French futur ant{\'e}rieur is characterized by higher frequency of occurrence and by a significantly greater functional load. One of the objectives of the paper is to find out some of the regularities which could be explained as a result of the characteristic features manifested by the verbal systems of the languages in contrast. The analysis of the future perfect tense in relation to the rest of the tenses has motivated the formulation of certain theoretical and practical conclusions which might have both specific and general methodological significance.},
	author = {Михов, Николай}
}
@article {Михов1983a,
	title = {Обобщително-актуализиращата същност на перфекта във френския и българския език},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {8},
	year = {1983},
	pages = {33{\textendash}41},
	abstract = {The paper discusses some characteristic features of the Perfect tense in French and Bulgarian in comparison to the past tenses and to the whole temporal system. In contrast to the Imperfect and Aorist, the Perfect manifests strong generalizing qualities and expresses direct contact with the present. The semantic similarities between the Perfect and the Present tenses are discussed. The similarity is enhanced in Bulgarian by the qualifying character of the auxiliary verb съм {\textquoteleft}to be{\textquoteright}. It seems to be a linguistic fact with considerable consequences in the language that the pass{\'e} compos{\'e} has adopted most of the characteristic features of the Aorist and has become the basic narrative tense. There are considerable differences in this respect across the two languages. The author maintains that the Perfect tense in Bulgarian exhibits some typical combinatorial preferences for certain adverbial modifiers, which can be a reliable criterion for defining the value of the Perfect tense in French. It might also facilitate the choice of the most adequate functional equivalent in the process of translation.},
	author = {Михов, Николай}
}
@article {Михов1980,
	title = {Съществителните със суфикс -ция в българския език.},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {V},
	year = {1980},
	pages = {20{\textendash}29},
	abstract = {The paper considers the characteristic features of the adaptation process which occurs in Bulgarian in borrowing French and international nouns with the suffix -tiоn. An important stage in this respect is the substitution of the foreign suffix by the Bulgarian morpheme -иране and the formation, as a result of it, of two classes of lexemes which have the same root but different suffixes, and are opposed by their relation to the expression of verbal action. In some words ending in -tiоn, the verbal action is insufficiently expressed; in other nouns it is completely lacking. Unlike them, substantives with the deverbative suffix -иране always express a high degree of verbal action; therefore, the class they form may be termed secondary or dynamic},
	author = {Михов, Николай}
}
@article {Михов1979,
	title = {Българското модално минало несвършено време и неговите функционални еквиваленти във френския език},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {4},
	year = {1979},
	pages = {30{\textendash}41},
	abstract = {The varying semantic and syntactic characteristics of the Bulgarian imperfect in various predicative units have been used to distinguish two basic types: the modal and temporal variants},
	author = {Михов, Николай}
}
@article {Михов1977,
	title = {Граматическата категория {\quotedblbase}време{\textquotedblleft} във френски и български език {(La cat{\'e}gorie grammaticale de temps en fran{\c c}ais et en bulgare)}},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {ІІ},
	year = {1977},
	pages = {104{\textendash}143},
	abstract = {La comparaison englobe deux plans principaux},
	author = {Михов, Николай}
}
