01279nas a2200145 4500008004100000245012100041210012100162300001200283490000700295520067800302653002200980653003601002100003701038856005801075 1999 eng d00aДекомпозицията като похват при заемането на немски сложни думи0 aДекомпозицията като похват при заемането на немски сложни думи a26–330 v243 a

Gegenstand der Untersuchung ist die gelegentlich vorkommende Kürzung von deutschen Zusammensetzungen bei ihrer Übernahme ins Bulgarische. Erläutert werden die Begriffe Isolierungen und Fragmentierungen als Unterarten der sog. Kopf- und Schwanzwörter. Die Aufdeckung der deutschen Vorlagen von Lehnwörtern wie абрихт, анцуг, блинт, винт,герб, хутпак, щрайх wäre ein Unterpfand dafür, dass die sie betreffende etymologische Information in Nachschlagewerken korrekt sein wird. Erst dann würde man beispielsweise das typographische Fachwort блинт nicht naiverweise auf dt. blind, sondern auf dt. Blinddruck zurückführen.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/parashkevov199901553nas a2200145 4500008004100000245009700041210009700138300001200235490000700247520100000254653002201254653003601276100003701312856005801349 1993 eng d00aНяколко случая на хетеросемия в балканските езици0 aНяколко случая на хетеросемия в балканските езици a25–300 v183 a

The semantic evolution of words is an indispensable part of their historical development. It is determined both by intralinguistic and extralinguistic factors. In the course of migration, a borrowing can be incorporated within the language of adjacent or remote language communities taking on a modified meaning within the same semantic field. This very divergence in meaning, or heterosemy, across language systems is a constant source of misunderstanding. The article examines the semantic deviation of a number of words common to the Balkan languages.The need to explicitly point out cases of partial or complete heterosemy when learning a foreign language, as a means to avoid interference-induced errors in translation and communication is stressed upon. In addition, the article takes the view that when providing the etymology of borrowings it is appropriate to specify the lexical prototype in the source or intermediary language and to trace the semasiological changes undergone.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/parashkevov199301334nas a2200145 4500008004100000245010600041210010600147300001400253490000700267520076100274653002201035653003601057100003701093856005801130 1990 eng d00aСловообразувателни парадигми при интернационализмите0 aСловообразувателни парадигми при интернационализмите a248–2520 v153 a

Examples from the international lexicon are adduced in the article, showing how two or more word-formation paradigms distinguished by a semantic feature are established in the framework of etymologically related derivational sequences. They contain functional-categorial positions which partly reflect in an adequate way the prototype and which are partly replenished with secondary home or foreign formations. For this reason, in the comparison of analogous paradigms in different languages structural and/or semantic deviations are established. Their systematic investigation gives evidence of the development of migration of internationalisms and their timely discovery in foreign language teaching helps the achievement of perfect communication.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/parashkevov1990