01184nas a2200121   4500008004100000245011300041210011300154300001200267490000700279520068400286100003500970856005701005       1991                        eng d00aОбратна топонимична деривация в руския и в българския език0 aОбратна топонимична деривация в руския и в българския език  a11–190 v163 aThe article studies groups of geographic names and detoponymic adjectives in contemporary Russian and in contemporary Bulgarian which from the synchronic point of view are reverse derivatives, i. e. derived words which function as formative for words of which they derive. Among toponyms in both languages there are full (formal-semantic) and formal (only at the level of expression) reverse derivatives. Adjectives are only formal reverse derivatives. Reverse derivation in toponyms functions within the framework of double derivation, along with the lexico-semantic one. The lexical groups in Russian and Bulgarian in question are characterized by a high degree of parallelism.1 aДжамбазов, Петър  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/dzhambazov199101265nas a2200145   4500008004100000245020900041210012600250300001200376490000700388520057400395653002200969653003600991100003501027856005701062       1990                        eng d00aРуски сложни прилагателни имена със съчинителни отношения, образувани от имена на български географски обекти0 aРуски сложни прилагателни имена със съчинителни отношения образу  a20–260 v153 a<p>Corrections in the typology of Russian compound adjectives with coordinating relationships are made and general results are listed of the investigation of the combinability, the word-formation structures and the word-formation typology of such adjectives which were formed during the Liberation Russo-Turkish War of borrowed names of Bulgarian geographic sites. These derived words are classified into two word-formation types, one of which includes derived adjectives of pure composition and the other – derived adjectives of compound-suffixal word-formation.</p>10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aДжамбазов, Петър  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/dzhambazov199001165nas a2200121   4500008004100000245024000041210012400281300001200405490000700417520052700424100003500951856005700986       1986                        eng d00aДеривационно преоформяне на имена на български реки в руските документи от Освободителната война чрез метонимична редеривация0 aДеривационно преоформяне на имена на български реки в руските до  a15–220 v113 aMetonymy is considered as a type of rederivation in the paper. The metonymic senses of polysemantic words and metonymic homonyms are the result of the univerbalization of certain syntactic units. On the content plane the derivatives coincide with the semantics of the syntactic units that had generated them, while their plane of expression is the result of rederivation.The initial lexical unit is a member of the respective syntactic unit or the generating word in oblique syntactic position: e. g. Tv{\u a}rdica village1 aДжамбазов, Петър  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/dzhambazov198600673nas a2200121   4500008004100000245024600041210012500287300001200412490000600424100003500430700002900465856005700494       1979                        eng d00aАктуални проблеми за сравнително изучаване на българския и руския език, отразени в първата книга, издадена на руски език в България0 aАктуални проблеми за сравнително изучаване на българския и руски  a60–690 v41 aДжамбазов, Петър1 aЧобанов, Иван  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/dzhambazov197901339nas a2200121   4500008004100000245017400041210012600215300001100341490000600352520076500358100003501123856005901158       1979                        eng d00aВъншна и вътрешна деривационна мотивация (според наблюдения върху българския и руския език)0 aВъншна и вътрешна деривационна мотивация според наблюдения върху  a3–110 v43 aMotivated polysemantic words differ from unmotivated ones by the presence of two types of derivational relationships: internal and external. The external relationships are the actual or apparent result of a derivational act and accordingly they can be primary or secondary. The internal derivational relationships of the semantic components of the motivated polysemantic words can be likewise primary and secondary depending on whether they are the result of an actual or an apparent internal (semantic) derivation. The semantic structure of the motivated polysemantic words is the sphere of interaction between word-formation (as a process and a result) and semantic derivation. The study of this interaction and its results is a question of great importance.1 aДжамбазов, Петър  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/dzhambazov1979-0