00616nas a2200145   4500008004100000245012200041210012200163300001400285490000700299653001100306653001900317100003500336700004100371856005800412       1990                        eng d00aПета международна конференция в Полша по чуждоезиково обучение0 aПета международна конференция в Полша по чуждоезиково обучение  a116–1170 v1510aEvents10aХроника1 aГеоргиева, Мария1 aЙорданова, Йорданка  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/georgieva1990-001625nas a2200121   4500008004100000245017100041210012400212300001200336490000700348520105100355100004101406856005601447       1987                        eng d00aВреметраене на гласните и ритмична организация на фразата (в английския и българския език)0 aВреметраене на гласните и ритмична организация на фразата в англ  a22–320 v123 aThe purpose of the article is to relate vowel duration as an acoustic parameter to rhythm as a language-specific feature of the phrase in English and Bulgarian. Analysis of variance and the HSD-test are used to establish significant differences between vowel durations in sets of sen49 tences. The results demonstrate that while the syntagmatic relation between stressed and unstressed vowels does not emerge clearly from the differences between them in duration, a 1:1 ratio is preserved between the total vowel durations of rhythmic feet in the same English phrase. In Bulgarian vowel durations contrast adjacent syllables as stressed and unstressed within the same rhythmic foot and work across rhythmic feet to arrange stressed syllables according to degrees of prominence. Different patterns for the rhythmic feet in English and Bulgarian emerge and a criterion for establishing the boundaries between feet in Bulgarian is suggested. English data also confirm extra-length of final vowel and shortest duration for [ə] as reported elsewhere.1 aЙорданова, Йорданка  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/yordanova1987