01327nas a2200121   4500008004100000245022600041210012900267300001100396490000700407520069400414100003901108856005801147       1988                        eng d00aЗа опозицията моноцентричност/бицентричност в английско-българските междуезикови трансформации to be → имам и to have → съм0 aЗа опозицията моноцентричностбицентричност в английскобългарскит  a5–100 v133 aThe article attempts to establish the semantic features of the verbs to be and съм, connected with monocentric predication, as well as of the bicentric verbs to have and имам. Some conditions are pointed out in which parallelism between these two types of verbs is possible. Two basic types of interlingual transformations are discussed: (1) to have → съм and to be → имам, accompanied by structural asymmetry of the predicative phrase, and (2) to have → съм and to be → имам, accompanied by asymmetry in the prepositional phrase. Some typical differences in the themo-rhematic organization of the analysed English and Bulgarian sentences are also pointed out.1 aСтамболиева, Мария  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/stambolieva198801198nas a2200121   4500008004100000245009100041210009000132300001200222490000700234520073800241100003900979856005801018       1987                        eng d00aЗа един модел на българо-английската асиметрия0 aЗа един модел на българоанглийската асиметрия  a17–220 v123 aThe article discusses the opposition non-redundancy/redundancy which appears in translations from English into Bulgarian. The study is based on a corpus of English sentences which follow the pattern ‘Subject + Link verb + Predicative’, and their Bulgarian translation equivalents. Redundancy is existent in cases when a certain seme in the original utterance is expressed more than once in the translation. Interlingual asymmetry is mainly observed in the rendering of components such as [CHANGE OF STATE] and [SUBJECTIVE] and it is manifested in the oppositions to be, ставам ‘become’, оставам ‘remain’, изглеждам ‘seem’, чувствам се ‘feel’, оказвам се ‘prove to be’.1 aСтамболиева, Мария  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/stambolieva198701164nas a2200121   4500008004100000245011700041210011700158300001200275490000700287520065100294100003900945856005800984       1985                        eng d00aЗа някои безлични конструкции в българския и английския език0 aЗа някои безлични конструкции в българския и английския език  a12–170 v103 aThe paper analyses some Bulgarian and English impersonal sentences of the type: Студено е (It is cold) and Студено ми е (I am cold). A distinction is drawn between the verb съм and be as copulative verbs and independent predicates. The view maintaining that similar impersonal sentences consist of two elements and have an existential verb is refuted in the paper. The structural differences made evident through contrasting the Bulgarian and English sentences are explained by a) differences in the semantic structure of the copulative verbs across the two languages; and b) the grater ‘flexibility’ of the English word.1 aСтамболиева, Мария  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/stambolieva1985