00534nas a2200133   4500008004100000245010500041210010500146300001400251490000700265653001100272653001900283100004100302856005700343       1987                        eng d00aВтори скандинавски симпозиум по аспектология в Упсала0 aВтори скандинавски симпозиум по аспектология в Упсала  a123–1240 v1210aEvents10aХроника1 aКабакчиев, Красимир  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/kabakchiev198701331nas a2200121   4500008004100000245018400041210012300225300001200348490000600360520074300366100004101109856005901150       1983                        eng d00aСинтактичният модел „V + О“,контекстуален маркер на перфективност в българския и английския език0 aСинтактичният модел V О контекстуален маркер на перфективност в   a34–410 v83 aThe syntactic pattern VERB + OBJECT functions as a contextual marker of perfectivity when transitive verbs in the Past Simple Tense in English and aspectually defective transitive verbs in the Aorist in Bulgarian are used. A limited number of verbs of existential and relational meaning make an exception to the perfectivity of the pattern in both languages. In English, the adverbial imperfective marker and the generic meaning of the object are two basic conditions that preclude the perfectivity of the pattern. Analytic combinations consisting of a verb and a noun, which are semantically equivalent to a separate verb and express perfective actions, are frequent in both languages because of the perfectivity inherent in the pattern.1 aКабакчиев, Красимир  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/kabakchiev1983-0