01110nas a2200145 4500008004100000245009500041210006900136300001200205490000700217520060500224653002200829653003600851100002200887856005500909 2004 eng d00aHeteronymenreiche Denotate auf dialektaler Ebene mit geringem kommunikativem Verkehrswert.0 aHeteronymenreiche Denotate auf dialektaler Ebene mit geringem ko a56–690 v293 a

Zu dieser Untersuchung wurde die Autorin in Anbetracht des extremen Heteronymenreichtums in onomasiologischen Wortkarten des rumänischen Sprachatlasses veranlasst. Sie weist darin nach, dass verschiedene Faktoren bei der Ausbildung bzw. Bewahrung der Heteronymenvielfalt eine Rolle spielen können. Im Aufsatz sind exemplarisch einige Ausdrü- cke mit einer slavischen Etymologie erläutert worden, z. B. pob{írc{\u a} ‘kleines Hanffaserstück’, blán{\u a} ‘Sohle der Schermühle’, lopát{\u a} ‘id.’, pop{íc ‘id.’, suvéic{\u a} ‘Spannholz am Brustbaum des Webstuhls’.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aLeschber, Corinna uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/leschber200401279nas a2200145 4500008004100000245012100041210012100162300001200283490000700295520067800302653002200980653003601002100003701038856005801075 1999 eng d00aДекомпозицията като похват при заемането на немски сложни думи0 aДекомпозицията като похват при заемането на немски сложни думи a26–330 v243 a

Gegenstand der Untersuchung ist die gelegentlich vorkommende Kürzung von deutschen Zusammensetzungen bei ihrer Übernahme ins Bulgarische. Erläutert werden die Begriffe Isolierungen und Fragmentierungen als Unterarten der sog. Kopf- und Schwanzwörter. Die Aufdeckung der deutschen Vorlagen von Lehnwörtern wie абрихт, анцуг, блинт, винт,герб, хутпак, щрайх wäre ein Unterpfand dafür, dass die sie betreffende etymologische Information in Nachschlagewerken korrekt sein wird. Erst dann würde man beispielsweise das typographische Fachwort блинт nicht naiverweise auf dt. blind, sondern auf dt. Blinddruck zurückführen.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/parashkevov199900668nas a2200157 4500008004100000245006400041210006400105300001200169490000700181520017000188653002200358653003600380100001900416700002000435856005500455 1997 eng d00aFirst language Attrition by Speakers of Bulgarian in Israel0 aFirst language Attrition by Speakers of Bulgarian in Israel a55–590 v223 a

The article deals with various aspects of mother language attrition, code-switching, bilingualism and trilingualism in the speech of Bulgarian Jews in Israel.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aAlmalech, Moni1 aBenatov, Polina uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/almalech199701953nas a2200145 4500008004100000245011400041210011400155300001200269490000700281520137100288653002201659653003601681100003301717856005701750 1997 eng d00aСлавянското влияние върху немския език и неговите диалекти0 aСлавянското влияние върху немския език и неговите диалекти a13–280 v223 a

Es werden hier slawische Wortschatzeinflüsse auf die deutsche Hoch- und Umgangssprache sowie auf deutsche Mundarten besprochen. Dabei wird auf die Notwendigkeit einer weiteren systematischen Erforschung der mundartlichen Einflüsse mit genauen Angaben über deren Ortsbestimmung hingewiesen. Die Arbeit konzentriert sich auf die Übernahme slawischer Wortbildungselemente ins Deutsche und unterscheidet Wortschatzentlehnungen mit slawischen Wortbildungselementen, Rückentlehnungen sowie Analogiebildungen mit slawischen Suffixen, die auf deutschem Sprachboden, vor allem in den ehemaligen Grenzgebieten und zweisprachigen Mundarträumen, entstanden sind. Es werden Bildungen mit den Suffixen -ski, -ak, -ik, -nik, -(l)ik, -uśk(i), -u{\v c}k(i), -i{\v c}k(i), -us, -uś -a{\v c}/-ac, -ar behandelt mit dem Hinweis auf die Notwendigkeit einer systematischen Untersuchung weiterer Suffixe. Die hier besprochene morphologische Anpassung der slawischen Entlehnungen auf deutschem Sprachboden erfolgte durch Suffigierung (bei Adjektiven mit -ig, -lich, -(i)sch, bei Verben mit -en, -eien, bei Substantiven – nur beispielsweise – mit -er, -nik) sowie durch Bildung von Hybridkomposita. Erwähnt wird auch die Verwendung slawischen Wortguts durch deutsche Schriftsteller als Stilmittel zur Wiedergabe des lokalen Kolorits der ehemaligen zweisprachigen Gebiete.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aШатковски, Януш uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/shatkovski199701102nas a2200145 4500008004100000245008000041210006900121300001200190490000700202520061600209653002200825653003600847100002000883856005300903 1994 eng d00aPhrasal Verbs in the Interlanguage of First Year English Philology Students0 aPhrasal Verbs in the Interlanguage of First Year English Philolo a31–370 v193 a

The work is designed to study the phrasal verbs in the Interlanguage of first year English philology Students at Sofia University. For this purpose the work presents a qualitative and quantitative analysis of learners’ errors and tries to penetrate below the surface phenomenon both into the linguistics and psychology of error. In order to draw up a complete picture of learners’ knowledge of phrasal verbs at this point, however, not just erroneous output, but the whole of the learners’ output is taken into consideration. Elicitation procedures are conducted with the help of native informants.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aMileva, Ralitsa uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/mileva199401071nas a2200145 4500008004100000245010300041210006900144300001200213490000700225520056500232653002200797653003600819100001700855856005300872 1993 eng d00aOn the Balkan Equivalents of a Language Universal (Expressions of the Type When Hell Freezes Over)0 aBalkan Equivalents of a Language Universal Expressions of the Ty a33–370 v183 a

Based on data from more than fifty languages, the author of this paper has reached the conclusion that expressions of the type „when Hell freezes over“ form a language universal. The mechanism of this universal is shown. Expressions with this meaning from all present-day Balkan languages are further examined. The article advances several hypotheses concerning the diffusion and the possible interrelation of these expressions. The final idea of the paper is that Balkan linguistics is in no danger of running out of data for further investigation.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aVrabie, Emil uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/vrabie199301062nas a2200145 4500008004100000245007400041210007000115300001200185490000700197520058300204653002200787653003600809100001800845856005300863 1993 eng d00aBeobachtungen zum französisch-deutschen Sprachkontakt in der Schweiz0 aBeobachtungen zum französischdeutschen Sprachkontakt in der Schw a21–300 v183 a

Der Autor geht von seiner eigenen Feststellung aus, dass die viersprachige Schweiz das Bild einer erstaunlich friedlichen Koexistenz zwischen den verschiedenen Ethnien bietet. Grund dafür sei die gesellschaftlich weiterhin bestehende Anerkennung und kommunikatorische Umsetzung des Territorialitätsprinzips. Der soziale Frieden könnte jedoch gefährdet werden, wenn die Internalisierung dieses Prinzips zu einem stärkeren Neben- als Miteinander der Sprachgruppen führt und der Blick für die spezifische Befindlichkeit und die Bedürfnisse des anderen verloren geht.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aCichon, Peter uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/cichon199300864nas a2200145 4500008004100000245011900041210011900160300001400279490000700293520025700300653002200557653003600579100004300615856006000658 1993 eng d00aКъм въпроса за славянските лексикални елементи в турския език0 aКъм въпроса за славянските лексикални елементи в турския език a187–1930 v183 a

The author expands and provides argumentation for data on the penetration of Slavic elements in Turkish. Her conclusions are based on studies of the dialects and the family names of settlers from the Slavic countries (mainly Bulgaria) in Turkey.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aСюлейманоглу, Хайрие uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/syuleymanoglu199301553nas a2200145 4500008004100000245009700041210009700138300001200235490000700247520100000254653002201254653003601276100003701312856005801349 1993 eng d00aНяколко случая на хетеросемия в балканските езици0 aНяколко случая на хетеросемия в балканските езици a25–300 v183 a

The semantic evolution of words is an indispensable part of their historical development. It is determined both by intralinguistic and extralinguistic factors. In the course of migration, a borrowing can be incorporated within the language of adjacent or remote language communities taking on a modified meaning within the same semantic field. This very divergence in meaning, or heterosemy, across language systems is a constant source of misunderstanding. The article examines the semantic deviation of a number of words common to the Balkan languages.The need to explicitly point out cases of partial or complete heterosemy when learning a foreign language, as a means to avoid interference-induced errors in translation and communication is stressed upon. In addition, the article takes the view that when providing the etymology of borrowings it is appropriate to specify the lexical prototype in the source or intermediary language and to trace the semasiological changes undergone.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/parashkevov199300938nas a2200145 4500008004100000245015900041210012200200300001400322490000700336520030900343653002200652653003600674100002900710856005300739 1993 eng d00aОще веднъж за личните и фамилни имена от цигански произход в българската ономастика0 aОще веднъж за личните и фамилни имена от цигански произход в бъл a133–1360 v183 a

The author offers an etymological interpretation of a number of first and family names of Gypsy origin. He points out that there are certain cases of homonymy among the Gypsy language and languages in the Balkans which hinder unambiguous etymological definition of names in Bulgarian anthroponymy.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aКостов, Кирил uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/kostov199301389nas a2200145 4500008004100000245012300041210012300164300001400287490000700301520079200308653002201100653003601122100003101158856005401189 1993 eng d00aЯзыковая редакция как следствие контактных межъязыковых связей0 aЯзыковая редакция как следствие контактных межъязыковых связей a211–2210 v183 a

This article examines the nature of language correction as based on the language contact between standard Old Bulgarian and Old Russian. Language correction is viewed as a consequence of interlanguage contact in cases of bilingualism. Language correction is further considered as an expressive means formed gradually as the borrowed language system adapts to the local dialect, and a dynamic system which undergoes partial transformation under the influence of the local dialect and its inherent tendencies of development. The above changes result in a certain differentiation of correction from the source language system. The local type of language correction however retains an unchanged core and a base, as well as the principles which differentiate it from the local dialect.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aФилкова, Пенка uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/filkova199301046nas a2200157 4500008004100000245003500041210003400076300001200110490000700122520060900129653002200738653003600760100001900796700001900815856005400834 1992 eng d00aWhy bother about those tenses?0 aWhy bother about those tenses a45–570 v173 a

The paper is concerned with the Sequence of Tenses (SOT) under conditions of bilingualism. The authors undertook fieldwork among Maltese University students. Unlike the Maltese mass media in English, in which SOT is strictly observed, the majority of informants do not apply it. The non-observance of SOT could be the result of interference from their mother tongue (permanent code-switching in family interacting). It could also be due to the attitude of Maltese students – speakers of English as a second language – to the „errors“ in SOT, which they consider communicatively irrelevant.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aKmetova, Tanya1 aSciriha, Lydia uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/kmetova199200976nas a2200145 4500008004100000245010400041210007000145300001200215490000700227520045500234653002200689653003600711100002400747856005900771 1992 eng d00aWortisolierungen und -fragmentierungen im Deutschen unter Berücksichtigung englischer Entlehnungen0 aWortisolierungen und fragmentierungen im Deutschen unter Berücks a64–690 v173 a

.Short words, known in German lexicology as short forms with a preserved word beginning and word ending, are additionally divided into word isolations and fragmentations. On the basis of certain criteria, the distinction enables their etymological equalling with whole lexemes and hence the uncovering of possible etymological doublets. This thesis in applied theory is illustrated with a number of short forms borrowed in German from English.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aParaschkewow, Boris uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/paraschkewow199200747nas a2200145 4500008004100000245007500041210007500116300001200191490000700203520024100210653002200451653003600473100003700509856005500546 1992 eng d00aЕтимологични дублети в румънския език0 aЕтимологични дублети в румънския език a21–300 v173 a

The article considers etymologically heterogeneous synonyms in Rumanian, one of which is an Old Bulgarian literary loan. Some observations concerning the fate of these Bulgarian literary words in the Rumanian vocabulary are made.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aАлексова, Василка uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/aleksova199201229nas a2200145 4500008004100000245012900041210012500170300001400295490000700309520062900316653002200945653003600967100002701003856005301030 1992 eng d00aИсторическото и функционално единство на джудезмо с испанския език0 aИсторическото и функционално единство на джудезмо с испанския ез a112–1170 v173 a

The historical inquiry and the periodization of changes in the content of the traditional notion Sefarad-1–2–3, preceding the essential part of the subject chosen, is an attempt to follow chronologically the events that preconditioned the complex history and the spiritual values of Spanish Jews. At the ethnolinguistic level, attention is drawn to the difference between Ladino and Judesmo, very often confused, both in the past and today, by their speakers – Balkan Sefarads. In its immediate social context Judesmo is viewed as a specific koine and its historical and functional unity with Spanish is proved.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aКънчев, Иван uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/knchev199200964nas a2200145 4500008004100000245015200041210012500193300001200318490000700330520033000337653002200667653003600689100003700725856005600762 1992 eng d00aКритерии за установяване на българските книжовни елементи в румънската лексика0 aКритерии за установяване на българските книжовни елементи в румъ a22–310 v173 a

On the basis of recent investigations and the author’s observations, the article offers a system of criteria which would help establish Bulgarian literary elements in the Rumanian lexicon. These are to be distinguished from oral borrowings that entered the Rumanian language in dif- ferent period of its development.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aАлексова, Василка uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/aleksova1992a00981nas a2200145 4500008004100000245012000041210012000161300001200281490000700293520038900300653002200689653003600711100003300747856005500780 1992 eng d00aКъм проблема за семантичното усвояване на лексикалните заемки0 aКъм проблема за семантичното усвояване на лексикалните заемки a22–270 v173 a

The article deals with the problem of the semantic adaptation of lexical borrowings. The basic stages in the process of semantic assimilation are pointed out; the semantic structures of the prototype word and of the borrowing are compared; the changes occurring in the process of functioning of borrowings in the lexico-semantic system of the recipient language are fol- lowed.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aТанчева, Татяна uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/tancheva199201325nas a2200157 4500008004100000245015900041210012700200300001200327490000700339520063800346653002200984653003601006100003301042700003901075856005301114 1992 eng d00aОбратното транскодиране като словообразувателен модел в българския младежки сленг0 aОбратното транскодиране като словообразувателен модел в българск a36–410 v173 a

The article is an attempt at applying a more abstract model of description of the slang lexicon. The authors examine a new word-formation model in the Bulgarian youth slang – reverse transcoding. It constitutes a two-stage, two-way operation of formal loaning on the basis of a mechanical equalling of two lexemes from different languages. Reverse transcoding is viewed in correlation with the phenomenon of transposition. The authors investigate two of its mani- festations: hybrid transcoding and myxonymic transcoding. They explain them through synon- ymy by showing the process of their appearance and their functioning.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aБанков, Димитър1 aВеселинов, Димитър uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/bankov199201107nas a2200145 4500008004100000245015600041210012600197300001200323490000700335520047400342653002200816653003600838100003300874856005400907 1992 eng d00aПсихолингвистични проблеми при усвояване на българска лексика от гръцки студенти0 aПсихолингвистични проблеми при усвояване на българска лексика от a42–510 v173 a

In this article, а psycholinguistic approach is applied in the discussion of the acquisition of the Bulgarian lexicon by foreign learners. By means of a free associative experiment made with a Bulgarian and a Greek group of students some intercultural differences in the understanding of words equal in linguistic meaning are shown. In the interlanguage comparison, some universal human regularities are manifested, typical of the process of verbal association.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aПетрова, Славка uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/petrova199201136nas a2200145 4500008004100000245016000041210012500201300001400326490000700340520050200347653002200849653003600871100002900907856005400936 1992 eng d00aСефарадските междуметия като резултат от езикови контакти и самостоятелна еволюция0 aСефарадските междуметия като резултат от езикови контакти и само a130–1330 v173 a

The article is an attempt to register interjections used in the Sefarad idiom in Bulgaria and to give them an initial interpretation. On the basis of empirical data, the ways of penetration into the idiom of borrowings are traced in order to follow its contacts with other languages. Independent Sefarad word-forms are registered as well, which evidence the vitality of the system of Spanish, and parallels are made – in so far as it is possible – with other Sefarad idioms of the East.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aМънчева, Дора uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/mncheva199201141nas a2200145 4500008004100000245012500041210011900166300001200285490000700297520054500304653002200849653003600871100003300907856005500940 1991 eng d00aБългарски лични имена от румънски произход в ръкопис от 1720 година0 aБългарски лични имена от румънски произход в ръкопис от 1720 год a27–300 v163 a

During the spring of 1720 the Jerusalem Patriarch Chrysanthos Notaras visited a number of towns and villages in South Bulgaria, gathered voluntary contributions and wrote down names for prayerful remembrance in his book. This manuscript, kept in the library of the metochion of the Holy Sepulchre in Istanbul under No 237, was published by Penelopa Stalou in Athens in 1984. The anthroponyms studied in the present article bear witness to the linguistic variety in the South Bulgarian lands during the first half of the 18th century.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aСтефанов, Павел uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/stefanov199101254nas a2200145 4500008004100000245018400041210012800225300001200353490000700365520058400372653002200956653003600978100003901014856005501053 1991 eng d00aИзучение комплексных единиц словообразовательной системы русского языка в славянской аудитории0 aИзучение комплексных единиц словообразовательной системы русског a24–280 v163 a

The article discusses the basic problems of the characteristics of studying Russian word-for- mation by speakers of closely related languages – Bulgarian, Serbo-Croatian, Czech, Slovak and Polish. Criteria are defined for the choice of the word-formation material for practical les- sons; typical difficulties in the process of acquisition of complex units of the word-formation system of Russian by the foreign learners are outlined. Concrete methodological recommenda- tions are offered for the use of a given didactic material in the practice of teaching Russian as a

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aВасильева, Татьяна uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/vasileva199101301nas a2200157 4500008004100000245013200041210012200173300001200295490000700307520064600314653002200960653003600982100003301018700003901051856005301090 1991 eng d00aОпит за семантичен анализ на някои жаргонни думи от играта на топчета0 aОпит за семантичен анализ на някои жаргонни думи от играта на то a36–400 v163 a

Problems are dealt with in connection with the semantic analysis of some slang terms in marbles game. On this basis an attempt is made to reveal their etymology, whereby some universal tendencies in the development of the slang lexicon are pointed out. Also pointed out is the major role played by the caricature-parody turn in the evolution of youth slang, which in fact is its active (generative) centre creating ambivalence, enantiosemy, ambiguity, etc. Semantic analysis of the term абе is made, viewed in the sphere of the ‘food-money’ metaphor, and the development of this metaphor in French and in Bulgarian is followed.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aБанков, Димитър1 aВеселинов, Димитър uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/bankov199101548nas a2200145 4500008004100000245016800041210012000209300001200329490000700341520090900348653002201257653003601279100003301315856005401348 1990 eng d00aАрхангелското евангелие от 1092 година като извор за историята на българския и руския език0 aАрхангелското евангелие от 1092 година като извор за историята н a34–410 v153 a

The aim of the article is to establish the degree and the language level at which the two basic transcribers of the Old Russian Archangelsk Gospel of 1092 kept the Old Bulgarian protographs unchanged and in how far they managed to reflect graphically the language processes characteristic of the living Russian tongue at the end of the 11th c. The manuscript in question is a valuable source of Old Bulgarian syntax and lexicon: it contains some unknown or not very well-known syntactic structures and lexical expressions. The phonetic and the morphological peculiarities of the manuscript, on their part, evidence the living element in the late 11th c. Russian speech and its role in setting up the language norm of the period. The stability of the standard norm is in some cases determined by the peculiarities of the Old Bulgarian protographs and in other cases by the living Old Russian idiom.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aСлавова, Татяна uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/slavova199001077nas a2200145 4500008004100000245014500041210012800186300001200314490000700326520044600333653002200779653003600801100003700837856005700874 1990 eng d00aКъм социолингвистичната характеристика на една словообразувателна промяна0 aКъм социолингвистичната характеристика на една словообразувателн a33–360 v153 a

The article discusses the formative -ara, typical of the Serbo-Croatian word-formation system, from the point of view of its functional and semantic peculiarities and the distribution of this element observed in recent years in colloquial speech in SR Macedonia. Some differences are established in the functioning of this formative in the two word-formation systems influencing its productivity, semantics, normative evaluation, etc.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aВеличкова, Славка uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/velichkova199001265nas a2200145 4500008004100000245020900041210012600250300001200376490000700388520057400395653002200969653003600991100003501027856005701062 1990 eng d00aРуски сложни прилагателни имена със съчинителни отношения, образувани от имена на български географски обекти0 aРуски сложни прилагателни имена със съчинителни отношения образу a20–260 v153 a

Corrections in the typology of Russian compound adjectives with coordinating relationships are made and general results are listed of the investigation of the combinability, the word-formation structures and the word-formation typology of such adjectives which were formed during the Liberation Russo-Turkish War of borrowed names of Bulgarian geographic sites. These derived words are classified into two word-formation types, one of which includes derived adjectives of pure composition and the other – derived adjectives of compound-suffixal word-formation.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aДжамбазов, Петър uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/dzhambazov199000974nas a2200145 4500008004100000245008500041210008500126300001200211490000700223520044600230653002200676653003600698100003900734856005500773 1990 eng d00aРусская фразеология в болгарской аудитории0 aРусская фразеология в болгарской аудитории a37–400 v153 a

The article discusses some basic problems of the peculiarities of learning Russian phraseology by native speakers of the closely related Bulgarian language. A classification of Russian phraseological units is proposed allowing the determination of the degree of difficulty in their acquisition by Bulgarian learners. The reasons for the incorrect or inexact usage of Russian phraseological units in the speech of Bulgarians are shown.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aВасильева, Татьяна uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/vasileva199001334nas a2200145 4500008004100000245010600041210010600147300001400253490000700267520076100274653002201035653003601057100003701093856005801130 1990 eng d00aСловообразувателни парадигми при интернационализмите0 aСловообразувателни парадигми при интернационализмите a248–2520 v153 a

Examples from the international lexicon are adduced in the article, showing how two or more word-formation paradigms distinguished by a semantic feature are established in the framework of etymologically related derivational sequences. They contain functional-categorial positions which partly reflect in an adequate way the prototype and which are partly replenished with secondary home or foreign formations. For this reason, in the comparison of analogous paradigms in different languages structural and/or semantic deviations are established. Their systematic investigation gives evidence of the development of migration of internationalisms and their timely discovery in foreign language teaching helps the achievement of perfect communication.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aПарашкевов, Борис uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/parashkevov199000884nas a2200145 4500008004100000245007500041210006900116300001200185490000700197520040400204653002200608653003600630100001900666856005300685 1989 eng d00aDie Wortbildungsadaptierung der Germanismen in den slavischen Sprachen0 aDie Wortbildungsadaptierung der Germanismen in den slavischen Sp a23–310 v143 a

The term ‘word-formation adaptation’ covers all processes of formal and functional inclusion of borrowings into the derivational system of the invaded language through derivational affixes. In the Slavic languages German lexical borrowings fall under the influence of adaptation processes: suffixation, morphemic substitution, morphemic correlation, adsuffixation and suffixal attraction.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aBieder, Herman uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/bieder198901352nas a2200145 4500008004100000245016200041210012600203300001200329490000700341520071100348653002201059653003601081100003301117856005601150 1989 eng d00aΒουργαροχωρια. Из словното богатство на неописван български диалект в Северна Гърция0 aΒουργαροχωρια Из словното богатство на неописван български диале a40–560 v143 a

A lexicological and a lexicographical interpretation of 147 lexemes typical of an unknown and so far undescribed Bulgarian idiom of a group of villages in Aegean Macedonia is given. The material was extracted from Y. V. Evangelopulos’ dialectological work Лексические особенности новогреческого языка в Западной Македонии (1974). The lexical material in question was expressly defined by Y. V. Evangelopulos as belonging to the Βουργαροχωρια villages, whose idiom is set apart as something independent of the rest of the Northern Greek idioms. Careful reading of the material shows that this, in fact, is a Bulgarian dialect.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aМладенова, Олга uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/mladenova198901317nas a2200145 4500008004100000245012900041210012500170300001200295490000700307520070600314653002201020653003601042100003701078856005601115 1989 eng d00aВръзката на белоруския книжовен език със съседните славянски езици0 aВръзката на белоруския книжовен език със съседните славянски ези a39–430 v143 a

A peculiarity of the history of Standard Byelorussian is its development under the conditions of written bilingualism and even multilingualism. Early Byelorussian-Church Slavonic bilingualism in the second part of the sixteenth century was complemented by Polish and Latin which gradually pushed aside Byelorussian in the middle of the seventeenth century. After the unification of Byelorussia and Russia Polish and Latin went out of use and the Russian language became dominant in Byelorussia. At the same time a new Standard Byelorussian began to appear on a folk-dialect basis along which it preserved, especially in its lexicon, traces of former interrelationships with the other languages.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aЖуравски, Аркадий uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/zhuravski198900986nas a2200145 4500008004100000245007900041210007800120300001200198490000700210520046600217653002200683653003600705100003900741856006000780 1989 eng d00aИз българо-румънските лексикални връзки0 aИз българорумънските лексикални връзки a36–380 v143 a

The article emphasizes the importance of Rumanian lexical data for the investigation of some Bulgarian dialect expressions. Some Rumanian lexemes preserving West Bulgarian vocalization of Old Bulgarian ú > о are considered. Examples are given in which Bulgarian e > Rumanian i and Bulgarian ъ > Rumanian {í in the process of borrowing. The phonetic relationships between Rumanian words and non-preserved Middle Bulgarian forms are described.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aБуджишевска, Ванда uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/budzhishevska198901366nas a2200145 4500008004100000245020600041210012800247300001200375490000700387520068100394653002201075653003601097100003101133856005601164 1989 eng d00aЛексико-семантическое взаимодействие некоторых русских и староболгарских слов в русском литературном языке0 aЛексикосемантическое взаимодействие некоторых русских и старобол a30–400 v143 a

The borrowing of Old Bulgarian words into the lexical system of standard Russian led to the formation of sets of synonyms of different origin (identical-root variants, e. g. врата – ворота, издать – вызвать, and different-rood doublets, e. g. алкать – голодать, зело – очень). The presence of sets of this type of synonyms of different origin conditioned the establishment of a lexico-semantic redundancy in the lexicon of standard Russian. The elimination of this type of redundancy occurred as a result of the reduction or the termination of use of the Old Bulgarian or the Russian members of the synonymic sets.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aФилкова, Пенка uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/filkova1989-001271nas a2200145 4500008004100000245018100041210012500222300001200347490000700359520060300366653002200969653003600991100003901027856005901066 1988 eng d00aЕзиково взаимодействие в един таен говор (говора на слепците-просяци от село Добърско, Разложко)0 aЕзиково взаимодействие в един таен говор говора на слепцитепрося a23–260 v133 a

The article is an etymological study of the vocabulary of a secret language used by beggars in the village of Dob{\u a}rsko, Razlog district. The author is the first scholar to have recorded this jargon, its specific functional transformation into a jargon of the male population having prevented its study hitherto. The etymological analysis reveals interaction between neighbouring Balkan languages mainly. Most of the loan-words have changed in accordance with the phonetic and word-formational rules of the locally spoken dialect. Some of them have undergone semantic modifications, too.

10aLanguage Contacts10aЕзикови контакти1 aВоденичаров, Петър uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/bg/biblio/vodenicharov1988