<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Кочиш, Михай</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">За членуването на собствените имена в българския и унгарския език</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1983</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">60–62</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In the paper Bulgarian and Hungarian are contrasted on a typological basis as regards the use of the definite article with proper names. A conclusion is drawn that the use of the definite article with proper names and toponyms in Bulgarian is quite similar to Hungarian although its distribution is more restricted than in Hungarian.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>