@article {Иванчев1991,
	title = {Особен поглед върху чешкия и българския консонантизъм},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {16},
	year = {1991},
	pages = {5{\textendash}9},
	abstract = {The article presents a new approach to palatal and affricate consonants in Czech and Bulgarian.A table of the consonants of the two languages is presented, followed by a discussion. This article by prof. S. Ivanchev is published posthumously and is supplemented with notes and comments by Bozhil Nikolov, Nadеzhda Kуtova and Miroslav Yanakiev.},
	author = {Иванчев, Светомир}
}
@article {Иванчев1991,
	title = {Юрий С. Маслов (1914{\textendash}1990)},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {16},
	year = {1991},
	pages = {126{\textendash}128},
	keywords = {in memoriam, Юрий С. Маслов},
	author = {Иванчев, Светомир}
}
@article {Иванчев1990,
	title = {Ян Петър (1931{\textendash}1989)},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {15},
	year = {1990},
	pages = {115{\textendash}116},
	keywords = {in memoriam, Ян Петър},
	author = {Иванчев, Светомир}
}
@book {Иванчев1988,
	title = {Българският език {\textendash} класически и екзотичен},
	year = {1988},
	pages = {239},
	address = {София},
	author = {Иванчев, Светомир}
}
@article {Иванчев1983,
	title = {По повод на статията {\quotedblbase}Една типологична особеност на българския и унгарския език{\textquotedblleft} от Александър Александров},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {8},
	year = {1983},
	pages = {47{\textendash}53},
	abstract = {Some further comments are made on the problem discussed in A. Aleksandrov{\textquoteright}s paper A typological peculiarity of Bulgarian and Hungarian as regards the fixed position on the dative possessive pronominal clitic in Bulgarian and its typological and etymological characteristics. It has been assumed that the phenomenon must have originated in three ways: it might have developed independently; it might have been the result of Turkic influence, prior to the contact established by Bulgarian Slavs with the Greek language. The influence of Hungarian cannot be generally excluded in the areas north of the Danube. Later on the phenomenon was influenced by Greek and much later there was Turkic influence again (this time of Ottoman Turkish)},
	author = {Иванчев, Светомир}
}
@article {Иванчев1982,
	title = {Към въпроса за съчетанията РЪ/РЬ, ЛЪ/ЛЬ в старобългарските текстове},
	journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика},
	volume = {6},
	year = {1982},
	pages = {103{\textendash}107},
	author = {Иванчев, Светомир}
}
@article {Иванчев1981,
	title = {Класически и екзотичен, българският език {\textendash} по-стар от българската държава},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {6},
	year = {1981},
	pages = {5{\textendash}9},
	abstract = {<p>In this article entitled {\quotedblbase}Bulgarian, a language classical and exotic, older than the Bulgarian state{\textquotedblleft}, the author presents his viewpoint on the importance of Bulgarian for the study of Slavic and Balkan languages. He discusses the criteria for establishing the beginnings of a language (the appearance of a literary form as distinct from the pre-literary stage, the foundation of the respective state, the use of a distinct name for the language, the settlement on a given territory, the emergence of specific linguistic characteristics, etc.). He focuses on the beginnings of the language, its specific linguistic features and especially on the development of the Proto-Slavic sound combinations *tj,*dj, *tl, *dl, *pj, *bj, *vj, *mj, *kv, *gv and the expression of possession. The linguistic situation at the time of the establishment of the Bulgarian state 1300 years ago and subsequent language contacts are touched upon and the role of Old Bulgarian as a literary language of the Slavic world is highlighted.</p>},
	author = {Иванчев, Светомир}
}
@article {Иванчев1981,
	title = {Развоят на *tj, *dj в шт и жд и етногенетичният процес на Балканите},
	journal = {Palaeobulgarica / Старобългаристика},
	volume = {5},
	year = {1981},
	pages = {27{\textendash}47},
	author = {Иванчев, Светомир}
}
@article {Иванчев1980,
	title = {Някои аспекти на синтактичната характеристика на българския език при съпоставката му с полския},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {5},
	year = {1980},
	pages = {38{\textendash}42},
	abstract = {artial syntactic characterisation is discussed in the context of the common characteristics of the contrasted languages. As regards Bulgarian these characteristics are Slavic (in terms of origin and language contacts), Balkan (in terms of contacts and spontaneous development) and a reflection of the earliest contacts of Bulgarian with the Turkic languages. As regards Polish, these characteristics are common West Slavic, exhibiting genetic and contactual features which have arisen spontaneously in their natural development.},
	author = {Иванчев, Светомир}
}
@article {Иванчев1979,
	title = {Иван Леков},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {4},
	year = {1979},
	pages = {114{\textendash}116},
	keywords = {in memoriam, Иван Леков},
	author = {Иванчев, Светомир}
}
@article {Иванчев1979,
	title = {Най-обща съпоставка на основната (безпрефиксална) глаголна лексика в българския и белоруския език},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {4},
	year = {1979},
	pages = {50{\textendash}59},
	abstract = {A tentative comparison between the non-prefixal verbs in Bulgarian and Byelorussian is made. Itt shows that though closely related, the two languages have their own specific character which is partly common to the respective larger language divisions (South Slavic and East Slavic) and is partly due to the differences which are unique and typical of a given language only.},
	author = {Иванчев, Светомир}
}
@article {Иванчев1978,
	title = {Бохуслав Хавранек (30 януари 1893 {\textendash} 2 март 1978)},
	journal = {Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics},
	volume = {3},
	year = {1978},
	pages = {92{\textendash}94},
	keywords = {in memoriam, Бохуслав Хавранек},
	author = {Иванчев, Светомир}
}
@book {Иванчев1971,
	title = {Проблеми на аспектуалността в славянските езици},
	year = {1971},
	address = {София},
	author = {Иванчев, Светомир}
}
