01009nas a2200121   4500008004100000245019800041210012600239300001400365490001000379520042400389100002900813856004500842       1993                        eng d00aО конструкциях с эмфазой именного сказуемого: фрагмент русско-болгарского сопоставительного синтаксиса0 aО конструкциях с эмфазой именного сказуемого фрагмент русскоболг  a145–1480 vXVIII3 aThe article is а study of Bulgarian sentences of the type: It is power which provokes revolution, which do not have an exact equivalent in Russian. The specificity of these constructions is explained through a number of factors: inversion, emphasis, the identifying function of the definite article, the complex derivative etymology and the coincidence of the theme (what the listener is familiar with) with the rheme.1 aНорман, Борис  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/220901154nas a2200121   4500008004100000245025700041210012900298300001100427490000700438520051300445100002900958856004500987       1991                        eng d00aАдвербиальные новообразования как результат семантико-синтаксических процессов в славянских языках (на русском и болгарском материале)0 aАдвербиальные новообразования как результат семантикосинтаксичес  a5–100 v163 aThe formation of adverb neologisms in Slavic languages (of the type Rus. мокро, забывчиво, стеклянно, Bulg. унизително, военно, театрално) is a morphological phenomenon related to the processes of syntactic derivation. Contamination, shifting and tightening are observed as such in the article. The realization of these syntactic prerequisites for the formation of these adverbs in any language occurs in correspondence with its structural-semantic conditions.1 aНорман, Борис  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/240901283nas a2200121   4500008004100000245027000041210012600311300001000437490000700447520063300454100002901087856004501116       1987                        eng d00aО внутриязыковых факторах номинационного процесса (по поводу одной словообразовательной модели в болгарском языке и ее соответствий в русском)0 aО внутриязыковых факторах номинационного процесса по поводу одно  a5–90 v123 a<p>The paper offers a comparison between word-formation patterns in Russian and Bulgarian with the meaning of superiority in some activity (Rus. перекричать, Bulg. надвикам ‘shout down’). Specific Bulgarian lexemes with the meaning of competition in some kind of activity (надвиквам се ‘shout each other down’, надвикване ‘shouting each other down’) are also discussed. The author draws the conclusion that the formation of such units and their corresponding concepts in the native speaker’s mind is brought about by a combination of a number of intralinguistic factors.</p>1 aНорман, Борис  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/298801062nas a2200121   4500008004100000245009000041210009000131300001200221490000600233520062700239100002900866856004500895       1981                        eng d00aЗа типологичната специфика на българския език0 aЗа типологичната специфика на българския език  a10–130 v63 aAn original systematization of the specific features of the grammatical structure of’ modern Bulgarian is made on a synchronic plane. The grammatical features are divided into analytical specific features and specific features pertaining to the Balkan linguistic type. By inference it is established that the peculiarities of the typological characteristics of Bulgarian are due to 1) features connected with analyticity and with the Balkan linguistic type; 2) features counteracting the first in the system itself; 3) features which are not directly connected with either analyticity or with the Balkan linguistic type.1 aНорман, Борис  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/373600894nas a2200121   4500008004100000245020500041210012200246300001200368490000600380520031200386100002900698856004500727       1980                        eng d00aЕще раз о словосочетаниях типа чаша вода в болгарском языке (на фоне соответствующих русских словосочетаний)0 aЕще раз о словосочетаниях типа чаша вода в болгарском языке на ф  a14–180 v53 aThe prepositionless collocations consisting of two nouns (of the чаша вода ‘a glass of water’ type) are analysed in modern Bulgarian. In terms of their grammatical relationship the head of these constructions, according to the author, is the first word denoting the exact or approximate measure.1 aНорман, Борис  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/385501406nas a2200121   4500008004100000245011500041210011400156300001200270490000600282520092200288100002901210856004501239       1979                        eng d00aСинтактичен каузатив в българския, руския и белоруския език0 aСинтактичен каузатив в българския руския и белоруския език  a23–300 v43 aThe paper is devoted to one of the varieties of syntactic derivation in the dynamic syntax of the Slavic languages; causative relations connecting sentences of the type of: The train stopped – The engine/driver stopped the train, illustrated with examples in Bulgarian, Russian and Byelorussian. Four basic ways of expressing causative relations are considered: analytic, lexical, morphological and syntactic. Special attention is paid to the last of the above mentioned ways: the expression of causative derivation by means of the presence/ absence of a direct object. Colloquial speech is a specific area where the syntactic causative is used. The widely predominant phenomena of occasional dereflexivization and occasional transitivation testify to the productivity of this method of expressing causative relations as well as to the regularity of these relations in the consciousness of the Slav native speakers.1 aНорман, Борис  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/405400368nam a2200097   4500008004100000245006700041210006500108260001500173100002900188856005300217       1972                        eng d00aПереходность, залог, возвратность0 aПереходность залог возвратность  aМинск1 aНорман, Борис  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/biblio/norman1972