01149nas a2200121   4500008004100000245014200041210012500183300001200308490000600320520062500326100003100951856004500982       1980                        eng d00aСъпоставителен преглед на видовата категория в българския и френския език0 aСъпоставителен преглед на видовата категория в българския и френ  a52–570 v53 aThe paper is a contrastive survey of the category of aspect in Bulgarian and French. Some basic uses of the perfective and imperfective aspects are considered. The French aspect is treated on the lexical, grammatical and syntagmatic levels. Irrespective of the influence of the lexical content of the verb, aspect in Bulgarian is mainly a grammatical category. The lack of a formal aspectual marker in French is compensated for by the use of adverbs, special phrases and above all by the context. The French language makes use of lexical, morphological, syntagmatic and stylistic means to express the category of aspect.1 aПетрова, Мария  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/393201028nas a2200121   4500008004100000245016300041210012600204300001200330490000600342520048200348100003100830856004500861       1979                        eng d00aСъпоставителен преглед на функционирането на имперфекта в българския и френския език0 aСъпоставителен преглед на функционирането на имперфекта в българ  a41–440 v43 aThe common and different uses of the imperfect tense in Bulgarian and French are analysed on the morpho-syntactic level: concrete, generalized, habitual, iterative and qualificative. The modal uses of the imperfect are also discussed: optative, the imperfect instead of the futur, the imperfect instead of the présent, the imparfait instead of the futur imparfait instead of futur hypothétique simple, and imparfait hypocoristique which has no formal equivalent in Bulgarian.1 aПетрова, Мария  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/4061