01162nas a2200169   4500008004100000245012100041210012100162300001500283490000700298520046800305653006000773653002500833653003000858653003000888100003100918856004300949       2014                        eng d00aКъм строежа на сложните съставни изречения в Ловешкия дамаскин0 aКъм строежа на сложните съставни изречения в Ловешкия дамаскин  a91 – 1090 v203 a<p>The complex sentences are described from the viewpoint of their conjunctions and correlative elements in the main clause. The paper analyses the mutual juxtaposition of the main and subordinate clauses as well as the optional use of coordinating conjunctions after some types of antepositional subordinate clauses. Emphasis is placed on the frequency and importance of the prospective phenomena present in the literary language during the National Revival.</p>10aanteposition and postposition of the subordinate clause10acorrelative elements10acorrelative use of tenses10asubordinating conjunction1 aДеянова, Мария  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/6600461nas a2200109   4500008004100000245010800041210010700149300001200256490000700268100003100275856004500306       1987                        eng d00aКъм историята на словореда в българските да-конструкции0 aКъм историята на словореда в българските даконструкции  a23–400 v111 aДеянова, Мария  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/297401970nas a2200121   4500008004100000245019300041210012600234300001200360490000600372520139400378100003101772856004501803       1978                        eng d00aКонструкции с факултативно предикативно определение в чешкия книжовен език в съпоставка с българския0 aКонструкции с факултативно предикативно определение в чешкия кни  a54–640 v33 aThe following problems were analysed: 1) constructions with non-detached optional predicatives represented by adjectival words and referring to the subject, treated from the point of view of their lexical realization and the transitivity/intransitivity of the verb-predicate; 2) the interchangeability between this predicative and a derivative adverb; 3) the relationship between the two constructions in the sphere of norm and usage. Considerable similarities have been found between Czech and Bulgarian as regards the lexical and grammatical realization of the constructions with predicatives; with a certain quantitative difference in the area of verbs and transitive verbs in particular. The similarities prevail over the differences also with respect to internal word structure and contextual semantic conditions for the substitution of predicatives by derivative adverbs. The main differences are in the speech realization of the two constructions: the predicative has higher frequency in Bulgarian while the relative adverb predominates in Czech. The use of the Czech predicative is further limited by the use of the present participle and other syntactic synonyms which are more widely used. The development of contemporary Czech (the language of prose) exhibits a tendency towards a restricted use of predicative constructions at the expense of synonymous adverbial constructions.1 aДеянова, Мария  uhttp://scripta-bulgarica.eu/en/node/4130