<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Наймушин, Борис</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Залог и преходност (върху материали от българския, руския и английския език)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Съпоставително езикознание / Сопоставительное языкознание / Contrastive linguistics</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2001</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">26</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5–13</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The article deals with the controversial issue of the relations between voice and transitivity. It is claimed that the traditional approach which maintains the existence of a direct and obligatory connection between transitivity and passivization potential contradicts language reality. A proposal is made to replace the traditional binary opposition of transitive/intransitive verbs with a scale of transitivity.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>